Capital Punishment for Convicted Capital Murderers is not a Pro-Life Issue

Capital Punishment for Convicted Capital Murderers is not a Pro-Life Issue

The late Pope John Paul II had a serious distaste, or even animosity, towards capital punishment.  However, he could not impose a de jure change (on this issue) on the Catholic Church as Church teaching had allowed for the use of capital punishment in previous centuries.  However, he was able to achieve a de facto change in Church attitudes to the death penalty.  This can be seen in the articles and opinion pieces published in Catholic periodicals (including local diocesan publications) in the past 15 or more years.  This altered attitude is also to be heard in Church pronouncements on the life issues as these pronouncements now include reference to capital punishment as something to be condemned (as it is unnecessary).

The same is now true in homilies at Sunday Mass in many, if not most, parishes in the USA.  I recently heard one such homily where the 5th Commandment was addressed by the priest.  The correct translation of the 5th Commandment is “Thou shalt not murder”. Note this carefully. It does not translate to “Thou shalt not kill” as some priests are claiming.  In this homily several weeks ago, the priest allowed for national self defense in the form of a just war (a concept the Catholic Church arrived at some centuries ago).  He also mentioned individual or family self defense when being assaulted with lethal force as being morally licit.  He was conspicuously silent on societal self defense and the proper application of capital punishment.  Well, I will not be so silent.  And, this was not the first homily on the subject that I found distasteful.  Last summer, at another parish, a priest specifically cited capital punishment along with abortion as being serious moral evils.

This inclusion of capital punishment in the life issues does serious damage to the pro-life movement’s credibility and effectiveness by introducing needless confusion into its message.  To be pro-life means that one condemns (and likely abhors) the taking of innocent human life (murder) by any means.  That is why the pro-life position condemns wars that are not justified, murder, abortion (in all its forms), euthanasia, so-called mercy killings, assisted suicides, and the withholding of basic food and water from severely, and even not so severely, handicapped newborns and infants (a growing form of infanticide in the Western world) and all other forms of infanticide.  I have yet to hear a persuasive, much less compelling, argument as to why capital punishment is correctly a pro-life issue. Quite simply, this is because capital punishment is not a pro-life issue. The convicted capital murderer residing on death row is not an example of innocent human life.

Ought the Church address the issue of capital punishment?  Of course, the Church can and ought to address this issue.  The Church, rather than attacking and condemning capital punishment per se, can and ought to address the serious abuses of its application in the world.  Here are a couple of examples of abuses of capital punishment that need to be condemned.  Summary executions, where there is no due process (no fair trials) are to be condemned.  Summary executions often, if not always, lead to individuals being executed who are either innocent of crimes, or are guilty of less than capital offenses.  Applying capital punishment to less than capital offenses is also immoral and must be condemned. In some countries (Communist China comes to mind, but there are other offending nations such as in the Islamic world), individuals can be and are executed for property crimes such as theft, or for such things as adultery.  Those abuses of capital punishment are rightly condemned.

You might also want to read this essay:

http://larrysmusings.wordpress.com/2012/06/19/common-ground-with-islam-islam-appears-not-to-have-much-of-importance-in-common-with-christianity/

Thank you for reading and thinking about this.

About larryzb

married male, mid 50s, USA, http://larrysmusings.com
This entry was posted in Religion - western and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Capital Punishment for Convicted Capital Murderers is not a Pro-Life Issue

  1. I think the reason why you are still looking for an answer to this problem is that your view is resting on the premise that only innocent life is worth saving. I think the Church is stating that all life, innocent or not, has value and worth. A murderer and a saint are both made in the image of the creator and thus have dignity.

    Look at it this way my friend, what if Christ only died for the innocent on the cross because they were the only ones worth saving. Looks like you and I would be missing the boat.

    I think we address the societal self defense as well. In the past capitol punishment was more widely accepted because the ability to restrain a person from society was limited. Now, at least in most developed nations, prisons and the ability to keep these people from damaging society are not in short supply.

  2. larryzb says:

    Dear Sir,

    I am not “still looking for an answer”. (How could you possibly get that idea by what I wrote?!) The above essay merely points out that capital punishment is not a pro-life issue. Cannot check my intelligence at the door of the Church. (That makes me a bad person.)

    Nate, convicted murderers sometimes kill other inmates or prison guards while in prison.

    Punishment needs to fit the crime. Living in the real world, as I do, I know people who have family members that were murdered – so this is not so abstract (or theoretical or normative or ivory tower) an issue for me, or for many others either in the real world.

    If you read the Old Testament, you would see that God “hates the shedding of innocent blood”. That is likely why death was the required punishment for murder. But, John Paul II thought he could improve on that and muddied the waters by trying to make capital punishment a pro-life issue. (John Paul II was estranged from reality on many issues, but that is the topic for another essay on another day. I do not believe it is necessary to defend the Church when it errs in order to be a good Catholic.)

  3. Pingback: Pro-Life Should Not End At Birth–A Reblog | catholicboyrichard

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s