media dichotomies, gender dichotomies, and opinion polls

The US mainstream news media is working over time to help elect Hillary Clinton as president.  But, in much of social media, madame Hillary is being excoriated (read shredded, ripped, etc.).  This is one noteworthy dichotomy, and it gives indication that the monolithic mainstream news media no longer has a monopoly on the publication and widespread distribution of ideas and opinions.





Polling data indicates there is a clear and undeniable gender dichotomy at play in this election cycle.  The majority of women voters support Hillary Clinton. The majority of men voters (except among blacks), however, support Donald Trump.  What accounts for this gender dichotomy?  Implicit sexism and reverse sexism?  Identity politics?  Not necessarily.

It appears that many (not all) women value the pseudo security the government promises them over and above true freedoms/rights.  A red flag should be that the government requires you to surrender some of your freedom in exchange for its “security” – and that is a very dangerous path to continue along.  More government is the answer to the nation’s problems. Yet, we have had more government under Obama and his “czars” for 8 years and we still face serious economic, security and societal challenges that have not gotten better.  Government mandated equal pay regulations, day care subsidies and abortion no doubt figure in many women’s minds and tend to move them to support Hillary Clinton.  Gender pride also factors in.

For many men, the issue is curbing the government’s erosion of our rights. The federal government tries through the activist courts, executive orders, and the ever-growing bureaucracy to restrict free speech rights, 2nd amendment rights, and property rights.  As well, many men do not believe that the economy (read: job creation) can improve with Hillary Clinton, who would continue Obama’s failed economic policies.

Now, we want to revisit a relevant topic that we addressed much earlier on this blog.  Do these never-ending opinion polls manipulate our thinking and thus our behavior, including how we vote?

Think about it.  You decide for yourself.

Here, in its entirety, is our essay posted on February 7, 2013.

opinion polls – do they manipulate our thinking?

Hello to everyone across the blogosphere!  The world keeps on spinning. . . . and we keep on writing – for better or for worse.

The question is a relevant one.  Do the oft touted public opinion polls affect our thinking on various issues?  Forgive me, readers outside of the USA, I do not know how prevalent the use of public opinion surveys is in other nations.  In the United States, these polls (surveys) are conducted quite frequently on a wide range of issues, and the results are cited on the news broadcasts (television and radio) weekly, if not daily.

Before getting to the “moral” of the story, let me briefly recount a relevant experience of mine back in 2007.  For me, the home is the refuge from the madness of the outside world.  That is why I do not like it when the privacy of my home is violated.  In the late summer, in the short space of 6 days, I received 4 telephone calls (always around dinner time) from an opinion survey organization asking my views on the very same issue.  (I have forgotten the specific issue as each time they called I tuned them out and told them that I did not want to be called on any questions.)  When I received the fourth call, with my patience wearing thin, I spoke at length with the young man.  I made clear that these opinion polls were not conducted to gauge public opinion, but rather to influence it.   Also, it was pointed out that if they wanted a random sample, they could always call one or more of my neighbors down the block or over on another nearby street.  They did not need my input.  It finally worked – they removed my number from their database and did not call me again.  Great!

Here’s the lesson.  When you hear the results of such surveys, what do you think?  How do you react in the privacy of your thoughts?

Say, for example, you are informed by the news person that 75 per cent of Americans support a certain proposed public policy action, do you feel uncomfortable if you are opposed to such proposed action?  It really does not matter what the specific issue is.  It can be a proposal for (or about) higher taxes, greater government regulations, restricting gun ownership (a hot, current issue to be sure!), so-called gay marriage, abortion, amnesty for illegal immigrants, capital punishment, reduction of so-called green house gases, etc.

In reality, these survey results are rarely independently vetted or audited to insure that the sample size was both statistically significant and truly random.  These survey conducting groups are basically on “an honor system” as to accuracy and truth.  There have been many cases of the survey workers allowing their own biases to enter into their work, thereby corrupting the results.  In other words, these large majorities in support of this or that may be not be real.  (And, there is another factor to be aware of.  Some respondents do not give honest answers.  If they think that the caller is expecting a certain type of answer, or may be condescending to a “politically incorrect” answer, a responder may opt to give the expected answer, even though it does not represent their true opinion.)

But back to what we intend as the main thrust of this essay.  How do you react when you hear that a very large majority of Americans, your fellow citizens, are in disagreement with you on a major issue?

Do you think that perhaps you are mistaken to hold the views that you do on the specific issue?  We have been conditioned in the US over the past several decades to think that the group, the majority, cannot be wrong.  Or, if wrong, only in very rare circumstances.  That is idealist nonsense, claptrap!  The majority can be, and often is, wrong or in error.

(Dear readers, this ought not be surprising to you.  Simply consider how much misinformation and disinformation we are assaulted with on a daily basis from the news media, the government, opportunistic special interest groups, etc.)

Our not so humble recommendation: Do not place undue importance on the results of these opinion surveys.  Think for yourself.  If you believe, based on your values and convictions, that something is right or wrong, then do not let a disagreeing crowd change your mind.  A nation of sheep is not going to remain free for long.  A nation of independent thinkers, not craven to peer group pressures, is one of our better hopes to remain free.  (It needs to be said that one ought to become informed.  Think independently, but also arm yourself with knowledge.  Additional knowledge may lead you to revisit your convictions.)

As always, we take no responsibility if these essays cause any cognitive dissonance in our readers.  If such dissonance serves to encourage and/or stimulate independent and responsible thinking, we believe this cannot be a bad thing.  Now, what do you think?!

end of reprinted essay

copyright 2016 –


  1. Good essay, Larry. I think you’ve hit the nail on the head, regarding the degree to which the mainstream media is not there to properly inform anybody with hard facts, but rather to influence their opinions on matters. Walter Cronkite was alleged to have stated quite some time ago: “We’re not in the news reporting business, we’re in the opinion-molding business.” Or words to that effect. This is a shockingly arrogant attitude for anyone to have, in my opinion. He (as well as much of the current-day MSM) seems to have an attitude that presumes they alone possess the wisdom to run the world, while common ordinary people are just not smart enough to make up their minds about anything. So “they” will make up our minds for us, supplying us with just enough morsels and tidbits of cherry-picked “facts” to allow them to say, “See? We told you so! So shut up and do as tell you!”

    It’s all very transparent to anyone to anyone who rarely turns his or her TV on, except maybe to catch a Presidential debate (which could just as easily be watched on the Internet). I just watched a very interesting exchange on this very subject between Paul Joseph Watson (of Alex Jones’ and Stefan Molyneux. Both of them seem to think the MSM is on its last legs, just about to suffer a death rattle. They are rapidly losing all credibility, and as far as I am concerned, this couldn’t come at a more important time for all of us. My only hope is that WW3 with Russia can be averted before that happens.

    Here’s a link to the video. I’m pretty sure you will enjoy it.

    1. Thanks Stephen for your comment. I will check out the YouTube link.

      Yes, we are in very dangerous times and Hillary – given what she did in the Middle East as Secretary of State – seems more likely to get the US into a serious war.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s