Has there been overreach here? We are begging the question. Why do we allow small but vigorous pressure groups to redefine societal norms? Why do we allow non-elected jurists to engage in social engineering that is unmoored from both common sense and traditional values? Food for thought for the citizenry.
(source) You know the saying that is often meant for children, “Give ‘em an inch and they’ll take a mile.” Let me refresh your memory:
- In the 80’s, homosexual activists wanted to be left alone and not discriminated against. Sounded fair enough. So they got lawmakers to amend theIllinois Human Rights Act. And that opened Pandora’s Box.
- In the 90’s, homosexual activists claimed that all they needed was a domestic partnership registry so that they could visit their partners in hospitals. They got what they asked for
- and before the ink was dry, they suddenly needed an upgrade to same-sex “civil unions” so their joint possessions would be treated like a married couple’s possessions. They got what they asked for
- and before the ink was dry, they were fighting to redefine the institution of marriage. While that tragic day will go down in history…
- and before the ink was dry, they suddenly needed an upgrade to same-sex “civil unions” so their joint possessions would be treated like a married couple’s possessions. They got what they asked for
- In the 90’s, homosexual activists claimed that all they needed was a domestic partnership registry so that they could visit their partners in hospitals. They got what they asked for
View original post 140 more words
